To the Esteemed Owner of ChatZoZo,
I wish to present a sincere request along with a critical observation regarding the Hindi room moderator Harman26. There is a growing consensus among users that the moderation in this space is heavily biased. It is not merely my concern, as even decent, non-controversial users have expressed their dissatisfaction with the way this individual handles the room.
If I am perceived as an abuser, so be it. However, the issue here extends beyond me. The question remains: On what merit was this Harman26 chosen as a moderator? Ironically, he seems to lack a proper understanding of Hindi, which is rather surprising considering he moderates the Hindi room.
Furthermore, this is a sex chat site, where explicit language, arguments, and confrontations are commonplace. Yet, moderation appears to be selectively enforced. When women face serious verbal abuse, there is often no intervention. But the moment someone retaliates against that abuse, a ban is imposed swiftly. Why is this the case?
If words like "chutiya" or "kutta" (which are often used casually in conversational slang) are considered severe violations, then I urge you to provide a comprehensive and transparent rulebook outlining what is deemed unacceptable. Additionally, another moderator, Shyam, frequently bans or kicks users from the Indian room, does he even understand Hindi well enough to moderate fairly?
Moderators are not superior beings; they are here to maintain order, not exert unchecked authority. Yet, we see instances where they issue bans or mutes over trivial matters, such as laughing emojis or informal expressions, rather than focusing on real issues.
If this is a personal issue against me, then by all means, state it directly. I will leave the platform if necessary. However, I cannot ignore recurring instances of unfair treatment. In real life, I have never remained silent in the face of injustice, and I certainly won’t do so here. If anything, the internet should be a space for greater freedom of speech, not restrictive control.
That said, I will respect and accept whatever decision the owners and admins make, whether it is to continue or even permanently enforce my mute. However, I urge you to reconsider who is being entrusted with moderation roles. A moderator should be respected by the users, not merely hold power over them, otherwise, ongoing ego clashes and dissatisfaction will persist.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Best regards. PerplexityAI
I wish to present a sincere request along with a critical observation regarding the Hindi room moderator Harman26. There is a growing consensus among users that the moderation in this space is heavily biased. It is not merely my concern, as even decent, non-controversial users have expressed their dissatisfaction with the way this individual handles the room.
If I am perceived as an abuser, so be it. However, the issue here extends beyond me. The question remains: On what merit was this Harman26 chosen as a moderator? Ironically, he seems to lack a proper understanding of Hindi, which is rather surprising considering he moderates the Hindi room.
Furthermore, this is a sex chat site, where explicit language, arguments, and confrontations are commonplace. Yet, moderation appears to be selectively enforced. When women face serious verbal abuse, there is often no intervention. But the moment someone retaliates against that abuse, a ban is imposed swiftly. Why is this the case?
If words like "chutiya" or "kutta" (which are often used casually in conversational slang) are considered severe violations, then I urge you to provide a comprehensive and transparent rulebook outlining what is deemed unacceptable. Additionally, another moderator, Shyam, frequently bans or kicks users from the Indian room, does he even understand Hindi well enough to moderate fairly?
Moderators are not superior beings; they are here to maintain order, not exert unchecked authority. Yet, we see instances where they issue bans or mutes over trivial matters, such as laughing emojis or informal expressions, rather than focusing on real issues.
If this is a personal issue against me, then by all means, state it directly. I will leave the platform if necessary. However, I cannot ignore recurring instances of unfair treatment. In real life, I have never remained silent in the face of injustice, and I certainly won’t do so here. If anything, the internet should be a space for greater freedom of speech, not restrictive control.
That said, I will respect and accept whatever decision the owners and admins make, whether it is to continue or even permanently enforce my mute. However, I urge you to reconsider who is being entrusted with moderation roles. A moderator should be respected by the users, not merely hold power over them, otherwise, ongoing ego clashes and dissatisfaction will persist.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Best regards. PerplexityAI
Attachments
Last edited:
