• We kindly request chatzozo forum members to follow forum rules to avoid getting a temporary suspension. Do not use non-English languages in the International Sex Chat Discussion section. This section is mainly created for everyone who uses English as their communication language.

ACCORDING TO YOU WHO IS BETTER AS A SPIDER-MAN???

Who is better as a spiderman

  • Tom Holland

    Votes: 2 13.3%

  • Andrew Garfield

    Votes: 6 40.0%

  • Tobey Maguire

    Votes: 7 46.7%
  • Total voters
    15
Most people choose tobey because of nostalgia and the other people choose him because he had a good Peter Parker arc.
As a spidey he ain't bad but he wasn't that comic accurate. His movies were solid (come on, it was Sam Raimi! What did you expect?!), only in the 3rd one, sony interfered and it kind of made into a mess but all in all a good trilogy!

Tom holland's first two movies were meh and he didn't have much character depth, both as spiderman and Peter Parker. In the 3rd one, he got a major boost in his role showcasing his scientific skills and spidey senses!! And the ending showed potential for a bright future for his franchise (hoping marvel make his character grounded, and make his villains appear more frequently)

But the GOAT is Andrew!! He was the "comic accurate" spider-man. Cent percent the comic accuracy, with his quips and his moves, his web slinging etc. and Gwen Stacy nailed her role too, their chemistry was one of the highlight of the 2 movies.
The franchise had great potential if they continued on the path with MJ and black cat to show up in the 3rd installation. Peter's father coming back....it would have taken the entire franchise into a whole new level. (Not to mention the appearance of green Goblin!! Damn would have been so awesome)
 
Last edited:
Ihsan said:
Most people choose tobey because of nostalgia and the other people choose him because he had a good Peter Parker arc.
As a spidey he ain't bad but he wasn't that comic accurate. His movies were solid (come on, it was Sam Raimi! What did you expect?!), only in the 3rd one, sony interfered and it kind of made into a message but all in all a good trilogy!

Tom holland's first two movies were meh and he didn't have much character depth, both as spiderman and Peter Parker. In the 3rd one, he got a major boost in his role showcasing his scientific skills and spidey senses!! And the ending showed potential for a bright future for his franchise (hoping marvel make his character grounded, and make his villains appear more frequently)

But the GOAT is Andrew!! He was the "comic accurate" spider-man. Cent percent the comic accuracy, with his quips and his moves, his web slinging etc. and Gwen Stacy nailed her role too, their chemistry was one of the highlight of the 2 movies.
The franchise had great potential if they continued on the path with MJ and black cat to show up in the 3rd installation. Peter's father coming back....it would have taken the entire franchise into a whole new level. (Not to mention the appearance of green Goblin!! Damn would have been so awesome)
Click to expand...
Yess exactly yrr you just explained soo well totally love this :heart1:
 
Timatee said:
Guyzz just choose your answer & then comment on below!!
Click to expand...
Each of these talented actors brought their unique spin (pun intended!) to the iconic role of Spider-Man. Here's a brief comparison:

Tobey Maguire (2002-2007)
- Pros: Brought a nerdy charm, emotional depth, and memorable chemistry with Kirsten Dunst's Mary Jane.
- Cons: The trilogy's tone became increasingly dark, and the third installment received criticism.

Andrew Garfield (2012-2014)
- Pros: Introduced a more brooding, intense Spider-Man, with impressive action sequences and a compelling romance with Emma Stone's Gwen Stacy.
- Cons: The duology's pacing and villains were criticized, and the franchise was rebooted.

Tom Holland (2016-present)
- Pros: Brought a youthful energy, impressive physicality, and a lovable, awkward charm. His Spider-Man has been well-integrated into the MCU.
- Cons: Some fans feel his Spider-Man is too reliant on Tony Stark/Iron Man.

Ultimately, the "better" Spider-Man is subjective and depends on personal preferences. Here's a rough ranking based on general audience consensus:

1. Tom Holland (average rating: 8.5/10)
2. Tobey Maguire (average rating: 8/10)
3. Andrew Garfield (average rating: 7.5/10)

And I personally like Tom Holland very much..tom-holland-bocorkan-judul-terba-20230614105852.jpg
*A_AICS
 
Anshhi said:
Each of these talented actors brought their unique spin (pun intended!) to the iconic role of Spider-Man. Here's a brief comparison:

Tobey Maguire (2002-2007)
- Pros: Brought a nerdy charm, emotional depth, and memorable chemistry with Kirsten Dunst's Mary Jane.
- Cons: The trilogy's tone became increasingly dark, and the third installment received criticism.

Andrew Garfield (2012-2014)
- Pros: Introduced a more brooding, intense Spider-Man, with impressive action sequences and a compelling romance with Emma Stone's Gwen Stacy.
- Cons: The duology's pacing and villains were criticized, and the franchise was rebooted.

Tom Holland (2016-present)
- Pros: Brought a youthful energy, impressive physicality, and a lovable, awkward charm. His Spider-Man has been well-integrated into the MCU.
- Cons: Some fans feel his Spider-Man is too reliant on Tony Stark/Iron Man.

Ultimately, the "better" Spider-Man is subjective and depends on personal preferences. Here's a rough ranking based on general audience consensus:

1. Tom Holland (average rating: 8.5/10)
2. Tobey Maguire (average rating: 8/10)
3. Andrew Garfield (average rating: 7.5/10)

And I personally like Tom Holland very much..View attachment 303038
*A_AICS
Click to expand...
Yes he is my fav too
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top